Intel’s Forgotten Future

– Hey guys, this is Austin This little box might not look like much, but inside is one of the strangest stories in Intel's history

So this is the Intel NUC8i3CYSM (bell ringing) Intel have been selling these little NUCs for quite a while, and some of them are pretty cool Last year we took a look at the Skull Canyon NUC, which had a proper amount of gaming power in a tiny package With a lowly Core i3 inside, this does not look nearly as impressive, and that's because it's not, at least on paper So traditionally, Intel has used what is known as the tick-tock model, not to be confused with tick tock

The tick, tock So essentially there are two different ways of building a new chip First of all, you just start with the big stuff The architecture of the things will actually legitimately make it faster year-on-year Once you do that, the next iteration will just take that design and shrink it to a smaller process node

So if we get a little bit of Michael's Toys action, let me show what happened just a couple years ago That is a really bad square even though I have a ruler Anyway, so say that this is the previous generation This would be 14 nanometer, which is pretty much what all single Intel processors use today This strategy worked great until they hit the 10 nanometer node

Now this is what the Cannon Lake chip inside is based on, and unfortunately, well, they hit some road bumps So the advantage of going to a smaller process node is that you can cram more and more transistors into a smaller and smaller area So if we have a quad-core processor, and this is very simplified, what you're getting here is basically the same number of cores but just in a smaller area, which means that not only is the chip either cheaper to produce or you can actually fit more cores So in theory, if you had a 10 nanometer chip which is the same size as the old one, it could be a six-core design as opposed to a quad-core one So when I say 14 nanometer and 10 nanometer, what I'm referring to is the process technology used to actually build these chips

So think of it like this If I'm trying to draw something really precise, it's the difference between using a Sharpie and a pen It is a much finer-grained tool which I could be much more precise with The smaller the tip, the more precise and the more stuff you can cram into these tiny, tiny little lines This is absolutely key to the reason why computers have advanced over the last 50 years

Every time you get a smaller and smaller process node, it means you can get more densely pack it with transistors which can be spent on things like the CPU, the GPU Really, this is absolutely the reason why things are 100 million times faster than they were in 1972 Now, the downside here is that the smaller and smaller you get, the more difficult it is to actually pack all these transistors I mean, seriously, at a certain point, you hit the atomic level where just things don't really get much smaller From 2006 to 2014, every two years, Intel were able to shrink the process over and over and over again

That is until 2014 where they hit a huge, huge wall Now this forced Intel to get very creative with their updates without the advantage of being able to constantly change their process Instead, they did things like add more CPU cores to pretty much their entire lineup, which brings up to the Cannon Lake CPU inside this NUC Now originally it was supposed to ship as a 7th Generation part all the way back in 2016, but as you might imagine, things didn't quite go that smoothly So why should anyone care about this little NUC? Because inside this is running Intel's 10-nanometer Cannon Lake processor, and up until this point it is the very first and only device that's shipped with it

So to compare, I have, well, maybe not a perfect apples-to-apples comparison However, this is an Aspire E5, and it does have a very similarly-specced Core i3, just a 14-nanometer version as opposed to the 10-nanometer inside the NUC Put these two side-by-side, and they're about as close as it gets They're both dual-core processors, they both have Hyper-Threading They both have a 2

2 gigahertz base Really, the only difference is that the laptop has a slightly higher turbo with 34 versus 32, but besides that, it's gonna be about, well, this is about as close as I can get a comparison So first of all, let's start out with Geekbench

Now I'm not expecting any huge performance differences, but what's interesting about this is that the Cannon Lake chip inside is pretty much entirely undocumented Now, yes, on the arkintel site, you can see that it does confirm at least that it's 10 nanometer, but beside that, this is an entirely new CPU architecture which has basically never been talked about before It's unusual because usually when Intel brings out a new series of chips, they're way more on top of talking about the different specs and everything that they've done to improve it, but with this, it's like it was a weird half-step that they never actually really fully acknowledged? Okay, so very, very close The NUC is very slightly quicker in single core, and a little bit quicker multi-core, but honestly, that's close enough that I would consider it to be basically a draw

Next, let's give Cinebench a try In any case, it definitely does not look like Cannon Lake is any kind of major improvement as far as IPC goes It's very, very close So in this one, the laptop wins by a little bit, 353 versus 331 I'm pretty sure that's entirely just that slightly higher turbo

I want to give a huge shout out to Ian from AnandTech for not only helping me research for this video, but also doing a terrific write-up all about the incredible saga that was Intel's 10-nanometer process The fact that this is a product that is in my hand in 2019 is kind of incredible 'cause for all intents and purposes, Cannon Lake has been completely shelved at this point So where are things today? Well, Intel has pretty much given up on the Cannon Lake chips in favor of going straight to Ice Lake, which in theory will be shipping later this year on a 10-nanometer process with improved architecture Essentially, it's a tick and a tock rolled into one Meanwhile, we have the NUC as what is arguably one of the only examples of an Intel future that we never got to experience, although judging by the performance, wasn't that all exciting to begin with

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.